The Medium from Andrew Rosen

The Medium from Andrew Rosen

Should Lionsgate Sell Itself to Survive AI Disruption?

How the emerging build, license or buy calculus reshaping Hollywood's AI-era IP strategy applies to Lionsgate's future—and the limits that activist investor Anson Funds misses

Aug 12, 2026
∙ Paid

Yesterday Semafor reported that activist fund Anson Funds wrote to Lionsgate management last month, arguing the studio should respond to the threat of AI disruption by selling itself. The letter argues “Lionsgate’s stock has reacted sharply—and negatively—to the release of new AI video models, including Sora and Seedance, which we believe reflects a default market assumption that a studio is more likely to be an AI casualty than an AI beneficiary.”

The letter posits that Lionsgate could “enjoy a premium as the owner of thousands of films, given the IP licensing that could come from that library.” Management has “struggled to define that to investors.”

Semafor appears to be the only external media party to read the letter—it is not sharing the full letter, only the core logic of the Anson Funds’ arguments. That said, this logic echoes something I argued back in June about Lionsgate’s equity investment in Runway, the video generative AI company:

“Lionsgate and Runway seem to be taking the traditional studio approach to AI. It is a studio that thinks short-form AI content and new IP with a hot AI platform counts as risk-taking. That contrasts with the Bollywood ecosystem where the entire production model is being reimagined and restructured.”

Anson’s logic is similar but narrower: Regardless of what may be happening in Bollywood or elsewhere, emerging models like Sora and Seedance present the traditional production model with a new calculus of build, license or buy.

Anson’s argument is that licensing is the best path ahead to unlocking shareholder value. The firm understands that there are limits to building in the new calculus of build, license or buy. But Anson does not appear to grasp the emerging “first principles” of the calculus of license or buy.

Who can Lionsgate sell to? Who can they license to? And how will it license it? There are limits to what a standalone production company can do in this marketplace—much less than a relative behemoth like Disney or NBCUniversal.


Past essays related to today’s analysis:

Disney's Bets on TikTok, Consumer Products and a "Super App" Depend on the Same Un-Sexy Problem

Disney's Bets on TikTok, Consumer Products and a "Super App" Depend on the Same Un-Sexy Problem

Andrew A. Rosen
·
Aug 6
Read full story
Build, License or Buy? Hollywood's Oldest Question Has a New Answer: Advertisers

Build, License or Buy? Hollywood's Oldest Question Has a New Answer: Advertisers

Andrew A. Rosen
·
Jul 30
Read full story
Why Kraft Heinz + Disney Licensing Deal Is One To Watch

Why Kraft Heinz + Disney Licensing Deal Is One To Watch

Andrew A. Rosen
·
Jul 22
Read full story
The Lionsgate-Runway Deal Is Bold For Hollywood, Not Bollywood.

The Lionsgate-Runway Deal Is Bold For Hollywood, Not Bollywood.

Andrew A. Rosen
·
Jun 12
Read full story
The Air-Gapping Problem: Why Netflix Can't Protect Warner Bros IP Through Cloud Partnerships

The Air-Gapping Problem: Why Netflix Can't Protect Warner Bros IP Through Cloud Partnerships

Andrew A. Rosen
·
December 10, 2025
Read full story

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Andrew A Rosen · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture